Yes, the ratings do provide something that can be used to organize the species. And even with the Eleazar's Ratings others can still form their own opinions about the species on that list. Although I suspect that the ratings don`t particularly encourage people to do so, at least when compared to a list without the ratings. So all in all the ratings don`t particularly prevent anything, but neither do they give a sense of objectivity.eleazar wrote:but i also want the list to be useful, and without Eleazar's Rating there's no way to sort the well-developed ones from the undifferentiated stereotypes.
Does anyone else have an opinion about the ratings? (Should they only be found from "Eleazar's personal evalutation of Species ideas" thread or be used together with the new wikipage too?)