Shield Strength too strong or bug?
Moderator: Oberlus
Forum rules
Always mention the exact version of FreeOrion you are testing.
When reporting an issue regarding the AI, if possible provide the relevant AI log file and a save game file that demonstrates the issue.
Always mention the exact version of FreeOrion you are testing.
When reporting an issue regarding the AI, if possible provide the relevant AI log file and a save game file that demonstrates the issue.
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
Regarding the suggestion of making shields also work against fighters.
Absolutely no.
It would bring the problem of making shields a must-have and reduce diversity in ship designs.
Absolutely no.
It would bring the problem of making shields a must-have and reduce diversity in ship designs.
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
I'm mostly out of this thread on the grounds I don't think either side is going to agree. I just had 1 comment on shield balance in general.
I think shields get more viable on the bigger more expensive ships. So possibly plasma and up are ok. The cost compared to the return on defense grid or deflector shield is too high. I'd certainly be happy to see these become cheaper. Maybe plasma could be cheaper/easier to research too, its sort of on the cut-off point where shields start working. Not sure.
I think shields get more viable on the bigger more expensive ships. So possibly plasma and up are ok. The cost compared to the return on defense grid or deflector shield is too high. I'd certainly be happy to see these become cheaper. Maybe plasma could be cheaper/easier to research too, its sort of on the cut-off point where shields start working. Not sure.
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
Ok I lied, I have 1 more post
Maybe a compromise on RIS is to cap it much lower but make it much cheaper. Make it an actual early game shield for robotics that don't have shield techs instead of a gimmick.
Maybe a compromise on RIS is to cap it much lower but make it much cheaper. Make it an actual early game shield for robotics that don't have shield techs instead of a gimmick.
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
I like those suggestions, I think they are sound.
Defense Grid: 15 PP, 50% of current RP. Intended for early game to counter MD and help against Laser.
Deflector: 25 PP, 66% of current RP. Intended for mid game (to counter Laser and help against Plasma guns.
Plasma shield: 50 PP, 75% of current RP. Mid to late game, particularly for bigger hulls.
Black shield: 120 PP (like now), only for big hulls (core part). Late game.
RIS: change formula in a way TBD... But if it can be used in late game too (so not too low the cap) it would be nice. It's the only shield that can keep up with tech development, same than old carriers are still great late game.
Defense Grid: 15 PP, 50% of current RP. Intended for early game to counter MD and help against Laser.
Deflector: 25 PP, 66% of current RP. Intended for mid game (to counter Laser and help against Plasma guns.
Plasma shield: 50 PP, 75% of current RP. Mid to late game, particularly for bigger hulls.
Black shield: 120 PP (like now), only for big hulls (core part). Late game.
RIS: change formula in a way TBD... But if it can be used in late game too (so not too low the cap) it would be nice. It's the only shield that can keep up with tech development, same than old carriers are still great late game.
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
Yes, that is the basic concept.
Fighters are able to move inside the shields to fire their weapons at point blank.
It's quite intuitive and a classic space opera trope, though absolutely not realistic (but space combat in space opera settings is imagined as a revival of WWII warship combat transposed in space, so realism is quite absent anyway).
Then as Oberlus wrote, it's (imho) a bad idea.
I thought that you meant that fighters would gradually go under the shields instead of going there on turn 2, and that may have been a good idea.
Shield would be too similar to structure then, so I prefer what we have now. But yes your idea is not stupid either, it's just not the design choice that was made.
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
I believe the cap should be 40, which reflects the PP cost compared to
More expensive than Robotic with Deflector shield with shield strength of 30; and
Less Expensive than Robotic with Plasma shield with shield strength of 54
You would only need a stack of 6-7 ships to achieve that.
Its a concept, and there is way more to it once you actually see the numbers. I assumed people would see the numbers in their head like I did - I will flesh it out more and post it in
In Other game design.
Hopefully sooner.LienRag wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 8:20 pm Anyway I'm getting a bit more confident in my ability to propose a new (and way better) combat system in a few months (end of august if I'm very optimistic) and fighters are one thing that would change a lot (not entirely sure as of now of how exactly - I have the general idea but balancing it will probably require a lot of work).
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
I think your first assumption was correct:
I easily understood those number pretty perfectly.Daybreak wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 12:17 am I would think that Fighters have to attack though shields, just like energy weapons.
However -
1st round Shields at full strength
2nd round Shields at 2/3rd's strength, and fighters get to attack
3rd round Shields at 1/3rd strength, and fighters get to attack if not destroyed or part of a secondary drop.
4th round Shields at 0 strength, and fighters get to attack if not destroyed or part of a third drop.
OR
1st round Shields at full strength
2nd round Shields at 60% strength, and fighters get to attack
3rd round Shields at 20% strength, and fighters get to attack if not destroyed or part of a secondary drop.
4th round Shields at 0% strength, and fighters get to attack if not destroyed or part of a third drop.
whatever % that starts to balance out fighters and shields.
My objection is that this system makes the estimation of the outcome of a battle considerably harder, because damage done on each round for a given weapon is now different. Annoying.
Plus not really solving any balance problem: if fighters do less damage at start and more damage at the end, fleets with plenty of PD and shields would be the best choice, because PD removes the fighters on second round (so fighters inflicted close to no damage) and therefore shields are always good to have.
Also, Daybreak, you still lack a lot of knowledge about the game mechanics. You are jumping to conclusions at the first sign of anecdotal difficulties in your games. I think it is you the one that is not seeing the numbers, e.g. the huge PP commitment that is to build a stack of robos with RIS compared to using cheaper warships and more colonies for extra production. Less numbers in the head, more numbers in spreadsheets and combat simulations.
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
Question Oberlus
Is it better to have -
RIS
Defence Grid
Deflector shields
Plasma Shields
Black Shields
When it comes to Fighters?
The answer is none of them
You keep going on about the Risk of using RIS but the fact is it does not matter which shield you use the same risk exists for all of them.
Based on PP cost, then RIS falls in the middle of Deflector and Plasma shields. Therefore its strength should be based on that. I beleive that strength should be capped at 40
I keep saying its not about risk or counter, its about where RIS should fit "within other shield stregths and their cost", and currently I believe they are too strong.
Fighters -
Would you agree or argue against the fact that in most cases early game it makes a lot of sense to just have big stacks of cheap carriers with fighters, like you and for that matter everyone are currently building? Very cheap to build, and ignores shields.
So would you agree or not? I ask you just to answer that question.
I believe that the current fighter situation is unbalanced, and I don't think just making shields cheaper is the answer. But I am not going to engage in the rest of your conversation about it, until I put it down on paper. You will have your chance to disparage me all over again then.
Is it better to have -
RIS
Defence Grid
Deflector shields
Plasma Shields
Black Shields
When it comes to Fighters?
The answer is none of them
You keep going on about the Risk of using RIS but the fact is it does not matter which shield you use the same risk exists for all of them.
Based on PP cost, then RIS falls in the middle of Deflector and Plasma shields. Therefore its strength should be based on that. I beleive that strength should be capped at 40
I keep saying its not about risk or counter, its about where RIS should fit "within other shield stregths and their cost", and currently I believe they are too strong.
Fighters -
Would you agree or argue against the fact that in most cases early game it makes a lot of sense to just have big stacks of cheap carriers with fighters, like you and for that matter everyone are currently building? Very cheap to build, and ignores shields.
So would you agree or not? I ask you just to answer that question.
I believe that the current fighter situation is unbalanced, and I don't think just making shields cheaper is the answer. But I am not going to engage in the rest of your conversation about it, until I put it down on paper. You will have your chance to disparage me all over again then.
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
that is because you claimed the robotic interface shields is overpowered, to which (it seems) nobody else agrees.
if your main point (now) is that the robotic shield is too cheap compared to the others...
i think oberlus argued to make the other shields more accessible (earlier/cheaper). So Id guess both of you kind of agree on that point.
anyway the discussion is way past its value here, so i am out
Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.
Look, ma... four combat bouts!
Look, ma... four combat bouts!
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
at its current supposed strength of being able to get to 120 strength being 30 more strength than a 90 strength Black Shield then it is overpowered, for how cheap it is. At this stage of the game nobody can even get close researching Black shield or close to that strength.Ophiuchus wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 2:49 pmthat is because you claimed the robotic interface shields is overpowered, to which (it seems) nobody else agrees.
if your main point (now) is that the robotic shield is too cheap compared to the others...
i think oberlus argued to make the other shields more accessible (earlier/cheaper). So Id guess both of you kind of agree on that point.
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
What stage of the game are we actually talking about? The stage of the game where you can plonk down a stack of 58 robotic ships onto the board, like it's actually nothing?Daybreak wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 5:35 pmat its current supposed strength of being able to get to 120 strength being 30 more strength than a 90 strength Black Shield then it is overpowered, for how cheap it is. At this stage of the game nobody can even get close researching Black shield or close to that strength.Ophiuchus wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 2:49 pmthat is because you claimed the robotic interface shields is overpowered, to which (it seems) nobody else agrees.
if your main point (now) is that the robotic shield is too cheap compared to the others...
i think oberlus argued to make the other shields more accessible (earlier/cheaper). So Id guess both of you kind of agree on that point.
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
Wobbly I dont think its nothing - but a stack of 20 ships at this stage of the game is pretty easy with a shield strength of 69.
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
Checked the numbers. Easy in this case is around 15 turns of full production for me, based on a single gun ship. Or roughly the same time as it would take me to drop around 30-40 diamond plated double-loaded static bomber ships onto the board. I think I'll stick to believing RIS ships are over priced trash.
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
I actually prefer direct fire. Your scout ran into my main fleet last turn and I'll save you the bother of counting, there were more plasma cannons then carriers there. Direct Fire is simple, solid and reliable.Daybreak wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 11:47 am Fighters -
Would you agree or argue against the fact that in most cases early game it makes a lot of sense to just have big stacks of cheap carriers with fighters, like you and for that matter everyone are currently building? Very cheap to build, and ignores shields.
So would you agree or not? I ask you just to answer that question.
I believe that the current fighter situation is unbalanced, and I don't think just making shields cheaper is the answer. But I am not going to engage in the rest of your conversation about it, until I put it down on paper. You will have your chance to disparage me all over again then.
I like that gunships have extra fuel and don't get caught out of supply, like LRs carriers did when he tried to invade with carriers.
I like that gunships can take down planet defenses. I've seen both you and Oberlus try to blockade outposts with pure carrier fleets this game.
I like that gunships can't be countered with point defense. Yes they can be countered with shields, but shields are expensive and generally unreliable. Flak guns and interceptors are cheap. Gunships are solid and simple.
For pure raw damage/cost I'll use bombers, particularly in defense where fuel doesn't matter, but if I'm attacking, fast gunships with plenty of fuel every time.
Re: Shield Strength too strong or bug?
Not me - maybe someone else
I like direct weapons as well.
However for the one shot fighters normally get, they are quite powerful, and a stack can do a lot damage.