Field images
- The Silent One
- Graphics
- Posts: 1129
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 8:27 pm
Field images
Last multiplayer game revealed that the molecular cloud could use clearer borders, so I thought I'd rework the field icons. Attached are two versions for a new molecular cloud (inspiration aurora borealis) and one new version for the ion storm (should look dangerous). Originals 2048x2048 px. Ideas, suggestions, comments etc. welcome.
- Attachments
-
- molecular_cloud2.jpg (81.16 KiB) Viewed 13113 times
-
- molecular_cloud.jpg (78.73 KiB) Viewed 13113 times
-
- ion storm.jpg (74.1 KiB) Viewed 13114 times
If I provided any images, code, scripts or other content here, it's released under GPL 2.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0.
Re: Field images
These images are great. Kudos!
The second molecular cloud has some kind of warping effect, as if it is collapsing? That made me think the image can also give the player some sense of it growing (when the tail of each point is closer to the centre of the cloud) or shrinking (when the point is closer to the centre and the tail is away from it).
The second molecular cloud has some kind of warping effect, as if it is collapsing? That made me think the image can also give the player some sense of it growing (when the tail of each point is closer to the centre of the cloud) or shrinking (when the point is closer to the centre and the tail is away from it).
- The Silent One
- Graphics
- Posts: 1129
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 8:27 pm
Re: Field images
Doing an "expanding" graphic will be simple, do you have an idea if/how it can be scripted?Oberlus wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 9:59 amThe second molecular cloud has some kind of warping effect, as if it is collapsing? That made me think the image can also give the player some sense of it growing (when the tail of each point is closer to the centre of the cloud) or shrinking (when the point is closer to the centre and the tail is away from it).
Mc2 and mc1 graphics are supposed to be either/or, any preference?
Attached an first attempt at a graphic for a nebula that may turn into a star.
- Attachments
-
- sun_nebula.png (191.8 KiB) Viewed 13093 times
If I provided any images, code, scripts or other content here, it's released under GPL 2.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0.
Re: Field images
Not really. I don't now how the appearance (creation), grow phase and shrink phase of field effects is done. Assuming the system is aware of the current phase (growing vs shrinking) of the field effect, then it should use one model or the other depending on that.The Silent One wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 5:09 pmDoing an "expanding" graphic will be simple, do you have an idea if/how it can be scripted?
Anyway, it is quite a minor detail. I think it would be more relevant for gameplay to know the current direction of the field effect. But for simplicity I would leave it as it is: you know the direction and phase of the field if you pay attention to it when you press next turn (problem for multiplayer games when you are not connected when turn advances).
As per above (simplicity), molecular_cloud2.jpg (the one without the warping effect).Mc2 and mc1 graphics are supposed to be either/or, any preference?
How does it look like in an actual map? Also compared to current nebula graphic. I'd say this image looks to me as if the star is already there?Attached an first attempt at a graphic for a nebula that may turn into a star.
Looking at actual nebula images in Google, this one is quite different.
Re: Field images
I know we aren't supposed to argue from realism here. So take what I say with as much salt as you like.
Molecular clouds are typically the dark nebulae you see, like the "pillars of creation" in the eagle nebula, or the head part of the horsehead nebula. So maybe something darker with a back-lit appearance might be good.
Also, something reminiscent of the Orion nebula might be nice for the star-forming nebula. As that's an IRL star-formation zone. Maybe a swirling proto-stellar disk in the center where the star might form.
Molecular clouds are typically the dark nebulae you see, like the "pillars of creation" in the eagle nebula, or the head part of the horsehead nebula. So maybe something darker with a back-lit appearance might be good.
Also, something reminiscent of the Orion nebula might be nice for the star-forming nebula. As that's an IRL star-formation zone. Maybe a swirling proto-stellar disk in the center where the star might form.
All of my contributions should be considered released under creative commons attribution share-alike license, CC-BY-SA 3.0 for use in, by and with the Free Orion project.
- The Silent One
- Graphics
- Posts: 1129
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 8:27 pm
Re: Field images
Like you said, realism is not the most decisive factor. My priority is that the graphic conveys some sense of what it does game-play wise - the ion storm damages ships and gives a stealth bonus, so it needs to look dangerous and intransparent; the molecular cloud nullifies shields, so I aimed at something that looks electric/energized, so the player will be able to imagine it interacts with ship shields. Most recent version below (as far as I'm concerned it's final).
Agreed - the star should probably look less matured. Will continue work on that.
- Attachments
-
- molecular_cloud.jpg (82.21 KiB) Viewed 13037 times
If I provided any images, code, scripts or other content here, it's released under GPL 2.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0.
Re: Field images
Maybe one could render multiple fields using coordinates of last/current/next turn?
Not sure what FOCS provides.
Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.
Look, ma... four combat bouts!
Look, ma... four combat bouts!
- Geoff the Medio
- Programming, Design, Admin
- Posts: 13603
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:33 am
- Location: Munich
Re: Field images
Previous positions of UniverseObjects are not tracked by the engine, so FOCS cannot expose them to scripting. If the movement of a field is scripted deterministically, then the previous position could be calculated. This wouldn't matter though, as there's no way in FOCS to tell the engine to render some extra textures on the map. Possibly something complicated involving multiple fields, with extras there just for rendering purposes could be done, though.
Re: Field images
I can see that. I'm just a big astronomy nerd. After all, my first post on these forums was about simulating stellar evolution in the game. I'd still like to see dwarf and/or giant stars in the game.The Silent One wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 10:47 amLike you said, realism is not the most decisive factor. My priority is that the graphic conveys some sense of what it does game-play wise - the ion storm damages ships and gives a stealth bonus, so it needs to look dangerous and intransparent; the molecular cloud nullifies shields, so I aimed at something that looks electric/energized, so the player will be able to imagine it interacts with ship shields. Most recent version below (as far as I'm concerned it's final).
The designs do look nice, but I would like to echo the criticism of the protostellar nebula, that it looks like a star is already there. Although the flash effect might be nice for the supernova.
All of my contributions should be considered released under creative commons attribution share-alike license, CC-BY-SA 3.0 for use in, by and with the Free Orion project.
- The Silent One
- Graphics
- Posts: 1129
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 8:27 pm
Re: Field images
Definitely agree here, gonna work on that one.
If I provided any images, code, scripts or other content here, it's released under GPL 2.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0.
- The Silent One
- Graphics
- Posts: 1129
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 8:27 pm
Re: Field images
Before I go on pause mode, an update for the ion storm though
- Attachments
-
- ion_storm.png (663.44 KiB) Viewed 12489 times
If I provided any images, code, scripts or other content here, it's released under GPL 2.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0.
Re: Field images
Ohhhhh... SHINY!!!
- Geoff the Medio
- Programming, Design, Admin
- Posts: 13603
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:33 am
- Location: Munich
Re: Field images
Do you have separate layers for components of the images? They could be rendered layered and slowly animated, such as by rotation or fading or tinting or scaling...
- The Silent One
- Graphics
- Posts: 1129
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 8:27 pm
Re: Field images
Positive. This image consists of five layers: blue nebula, red nebula glow, red nebula, "ions" glow and ions blur.Geoff the Medio wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 5:48 amDo you have separate layers for components of the images?
That'd be great, art-wise I can provide whatever is needed. Code-wise, my past attempts with OpenGL were somewhat discouraging.Geoff the Medio wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 5:48 amThey could be rendered layered and slowly animated, such as by rotation or fading or tinting or scaling...
If such a thing were implemented I could also take up my work on the (animated?) sidepanel stars again.
If I provided any images, code, scripts or other content here, it's released under GPL 2.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0.
- The Silent One
- Graphics
- Posts: 1129
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 8:27 pm
Re: Field images
Alternative version for ion storm, more lighning-y.
- Attachments
-
- ion storm8.png (976.44 KiB) Viewed 11980 times
If I provided any images, code, scripts or other content here, it's released under GPL 2.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0.