FreeOrion

My point being that, if another specie will use the same EP table, a macro will already be available.



Sounds reasonable to me.

I toyed around with another idea today: Minor species protecting their system with ships (handled as space monsters).

Gameplay reasons:
Some of the good specials generate Guardians to make the player invest something for their gain, so why not some useful minor species too.

Flavor reasons:
For example the Acimera are an advanced species, but cannot leave their planet. It would be only natural for them to build remote controlled guardian ships to defend their planet/system from empires.

Implementation:
I already managed to give the Acimera an EffectsGroup that generates a guardian ship at turn 0. I want to expand that to a steady production of ships (like another ship every 40 turns). Is there a way to use the residual/modulo function in the activation condition (in c++ lang: Turn % 40 = 0)?

Uh, and what do you think about this in general?

_________________
All released under the GNU GPL 2.0 and Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 licences.

Could be “fun”. But, instead of having a steady production, why not a random chance of a new ship appearing? And, as for the kind of ship appearing, I’d prefer seeing several classes (also at random) than always the same class and its improvements, like what is done for the AI players.

Small frigates and rare cruiser or logistic ships, or anything else, could be more fun than having a lot of Mark X stationing with an increasing number around a planet…

revision 4736
"More species macros especially growth-rate variability by sloth."

I replaced the species-specific asymmetrical EP tables with standardized "NARROW" and "BROAD" symetrical EP tables, and changed a few details, but it is substantially what sloth produced


Building spaceships is pretty much the concrete distinction between Imperial species (currently all playable) and minor species. If you want more empires, up the number when you start the game. Generally it's assumed that the minor species aren't spacefaring empires because they don't have the techs (or mindset) to make ships and leave their system.

However it is plausible that the Caretaker Precursors would protect some species with Guardian ships or even better-- shields.

However in the case of the Acimera it makes sense that they have ships, but aren't imperial. Since you've made it, we might as well put it in and see how it plays.

_________________
—• Read this First before posting Game Design Ideas!
—• Design Philosophy
—•— My Ideas, Organized —•— Get an Avatar —•— Acronyms —•—

Thanks eleazar.


Here is the patch (the Acirema will now produce ships on turn 10, 80, 150, 220 and 290, but only if there is no empire next to them):

_________________
All released under the GNU GPL 2.0 and Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 licences.

I have added another feature to the Acirema: Their planet will now be protected with a Shield of 5 and a Defense of 5.

_________________
All released under the GNU GPL 2.0 and Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 licences.

Cool, i'll get that in soon.

_________________
—• Read this First before posting Game Design Ideas!
—• Design Philosophy
—•— My Ideas, Organized —•— Get an Avatar —•— Acronyms —•—

Geoff, So, what is the "native flag"?

Adding "Native" doesn't work, and breaks the following definitions.

_________________
—• Read this First before posting Game Design Ideas!
—• Design Philosophy
—•— My Ideas, Organized —•— Get an Avatar —•— Acronyms —•—

As suggested by the quotes, the flag is set by putting Native in the species definition on the line after where Playable appears or could appear.
It should work, after Playable, in the 4747 build.

Special order again, huh?
Ok it works as long as it does not fall after "CanColonize" or "CanBuildShips"

revision 4748
"re-added native species with the new tag."

revision 4749
"Now Acirema build ships occansionally and have some defenses by Sloth."

_________________
—• Read this First before posting Game Design Ideas!
—• Design Philosophy
—•— My Ideas, Organized —•— Get an Avatar —•— Acronyms —•—

I think you forgot the SETINON and NYMNMN species.

Thanks eleazar.

_________________
All released under the GNU GPL 2.0 and Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 licences.

Yep, thanks.

Fixed in 4750

_________________
—• Read this First before posting Game Design Ideas!
—• Design Philosophy
—•— My Ideas, Organized —•— Get an Avatar —•— Acronyms —•—

revision 4776
"Some tweaks to species:
> * Game humans all average stats for testing purposes
> * Added Volp-Puglush-Vuu and Ourbools minor species
> * Gave tunnels special on turn 1 to appropriate subterrainian species"

_________________
—• Read this First before posting Game Design Ideas!
—• Design Philosophy
—•— My Ideas, Organized —•— Get an Avatar —•— Acronyms —•—

I've simplified the naming convention of the species macros and how they are used:

Previously

"No(ne)" produces nothing
"Terrible" produces 50%
"Poor" produces 75% (currently not used)
"Average" produces 100%
"Good" produces 150% (currently not used)
"Great" produces 200%
"Ultimate" produces 300%

Now (r4781)

"No(ne)" produces nothing
"Bad" produces 50%
"Average" produces 100%
"Good" produces 150%
"Great" produces 250%
"Ultimate" produces 400%

"Ultimate" is now very rare, and probably will only be given to planet-bound species and/precursors. It's bonus theoretically pushes production past 100 so "Ultimate" species are gimped. "Hidden Gardener" for instance won't appear on a "Huge" world.

We're striving for a game that presents the player with significant choices, not tiny micromanage-y choices of dubious important. So i combined "Poor" and "Terrible" into a single, more obviously named "Bad".



The precise numbers of course may change.

_________________
—• Read this First before posting Game Design Ideas!
—• Design Philosophy
—•— My Ideas, Organized —•— Get an Avatar —•— Acronyms —•—

This sounds very odd. Sure having just a few options makes the decision making easier for the player, since there isn`t much to choose from, but it can also make a game to loose much of its replay value, since all the possible combinations are quickly tested and played through. Also with just 8 different species you could get a max 8 species game in a 500 star galaxy without having to take two representatives of some of the same species in a single galaxy, which at least in my opinion pretty much ruins the immersion of unique alien species. (I am not saying that this shouldn`t be allowed at all, but that the player should definitely have an option to decide if he/she wants to have just one of each species in a galaxy or allows for more than one to occur.) Also if there where like 16 playable alien species to choose from, the player could have an 8 player (quite large) game without having all the possible species in a single game.

But after that been said of course the species that are chosen to the game should be interesting and at least in some way different from each other, what ever the final number will be.

_________________
What is your favourite alien species and WHY?
Preliminary thoughts about diplomacy
Some unfinished ideas for specials